Enlicitide’s Phase 3 Triumphs Herald New Era for PCSK9 Inhibitors and Cholesterol Management

Merck’s enlicitide achieves Phase 3 endpoints, signaling a shift toward oral PCSK9 therapy that complements global injectables like Repatha and Praluent, siRNA therapy Leqvio, and emerging domestic inhibitors such as Sintbilo.

On September 2, 2025, Merck announced that its oral PCSK9 inhibitor, enlicitide decanoate (MK-0616), achieved all primary and key secondary endpoints in the Phase 3 CORALreef Lipids trial, marking its third successful Phase 3 study following CORALreef HeFH and AddOn [1]. As the first oral PCSK9 inhibitor to demonstrate significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions in Phase 3, enlicitide could transform cholesterol management. With cardiovascular disease claiming 18 million lives globally, including significant burdens in the US and China [2], this SinoDrugWatch review provides an overview of the PCSK9 inhibitor landscape, Merck’s milestone, and comparisons with AstraZeneca’s AZD0780, highlighting opportunities for oral therapies in a competitive market.


Understanding PCSK9 Inhibitors

PCSK9 inhibitors target the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) protein, which inhibits LDL receptor activity in the liver, reducing LDL-C clearance [3]. By blocking PCSK9, these drugs enhance LDL-C removal, lowering the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), such as heart attacks and strokes [3]. Since 2015, PCSK9 inhibitors have evolved across three main types:

  • Monoclonal antibodies (e.g., Amgen’s Repatha [evolocumab], Sanofi/Regeneron’s Praluent [alirocumab]) bind circulating PCSK9, preventing its interaction with LDL receptors, but require biweekly or monthly injections [4].
  • siRNA therapies (e.g., Novartis’ Leqvio [inclisiran]) use small interfering RNA to reduce PCSK9 production in hepatocytes, offering twice-yearly dosing [5].
  • Oral inhibitors (e.g., Merck’s enlicitide, a macrocyclic peptide; AstraZeneca’s AZD0780, a small molecule) inhibit PCSK9 via daily pills, improving convenience [1, 6].

Despite their efficacy, injectables face challenges: needle-based delivery reduces adherence, and high costs limit access, impacting the 86 million US adults and millions in China with hypercholesterolemia [2, 7]. Oral inhibitors promise to address these barriers, potentially reshaping treatment for high-risk patients by simplifying administration and improving compliance [6].


PCSK9 Inhibitor Landscape: US and China

The global PCSK9 inhibitor market, valued at USD 2.5–3 billion in 2024, is projected to reach USD 7–8 billion by 2030 (CAGR 16–20%) [8, 9]. Monoclonal antibodies dominate, but oral and siRNA therapies are gaining traction.

United States

The US holds 46% of global market share, driven by high CVD prevalence (86 million adults) [8]. Key drugs include:

  • Evolocumab (Repatha, Amgen): Monoclonal antibody, approved 2015 for hypercholesterolemia/ASCVD [4].
  • Alirocumab (Praluent, Sanofi/Regeneron): Monoclonal antibody, approved 2015, expanded for pediatric use [4].
  • Inclisiran (Leqvio, Novartis): siRNA, approved 2021, dosed twice yearly [5].

High costs (~$14,000/year initially, now lower) and insurance rejections (~31%) are challenges [8]. Pipeline candidates include LIB Therapeutics’ lerodalcibep (Fc-fusion PCSK9, BLA accepted Feb 2025) and enlicitide [10].

China

China leads the Asia-Pacific market (23.5% global share, CAGR 22%), driven by rising CVD rates [8, 9]. PCSK9 uptake remains underpenetrated, with fewer than 5% of eligible patients receiving therapy due to high costs and injection burden [7]. Sanofi’s withdrawal of Praluent in August 2025 due to supply issues and competition from domestic drugs like Innovent’s Sintbilo shifts the landscape [11]. The table below details marketed therapies in China:

Marketed PCSK9 Therapies in China

Drug (Generic)

Brand Name (China)

Company

Drug Type

Global Launch (EU / US)

China Launch

Insurance Coverage

Price (per dose)

Annual Treatment Cost

Notes

Evolocumab

Repatha

Amgen

mAb  

2015.07 (EU) / 2015.08 (US)

2018.07

2021

¥1,298 / ¥283.8

¥33,748 / ¥7,379 (insured)

First PCSK9 globally; first in China

Alirocumab

Praluent (Bolida)

Sanofi / Regeneron

mAb  

2015.09 (EU) / 2015.07 (US)

2019.12

2021 (Withdrawn 2025.08)

¥1,888 / ¥290.7

¥49,088 / ¥7,558 (insured)

Withdrawn Aug 2025 from China

Tafolecimab

Sintbilo

Innovent Biologics

mAb  

2023.08

2024

¥1,388 / ¥286

¥36,080 / ¥7,436 (insured)

First domestic PCSK9 in China; Innovent’s CV entry

Inclisiran

Leqvio

Novartis / Alnylam

siRNA

2020.12 (EU) / 2021.12 (US)

2023.08

No

¥9,988

¥19,976

First siRNA PCSK9 in China

Ongericimab

Junshida

Junshi Biosciences

mAb  

2024.01

No

¥1,360

¥35,457

Second domestic PCSK9

ebronucimab

Yixining

Akeso

mAb  

2024.09

No

¥1,800

¥46,928

Recaticimab

Aixin’an

Hengrui Pharma

mAb  

2025.01

No

Praluent’s exit creates opportunities for domestic players like Innovent and oral therapies like enlicitide, especially if they secure National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) inclusion [11].


Merck’s CORALreef Program: Three Phase 3 Triumphs

Merck’s CORALreef program includes three Phase 3 trials for enlicitide: CORALreef Lipids, HeFH, and AddOn [1]. The CORALreef Lipids trial (NCT05952856), announced on September 2, 2025, tested enlicitide in adults with hypercholesterolemia on statins (or statin-intolerant) and at risk for ASCVD. It met its primary endpoint, achieving a statistically significant and clinically meaningful LDL-C reduction at 24 weeks versus placebo, with reductions in non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] [1]. CORALreef HeFH and AddOn trials also showed significant LDL-C reductions, though specific numerical results for all three trials are pending presentation at a scientific congress [1]. Phase 2b data showed LDL-C reductions of 41.2–60.9% across doses (6 mg, 12 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg), among the strongest for PCSK9 therapies [12]. Safety was robust, with adverse events (AEs) comparable to placebo and low discontinuation rates [1]. Merck is engaging global regulators, and the CORALreef Outcomes trial (14,500+ participants) will assess cardiovascular event prevention [1].


Comparing Enlicitide and AZD0780

Enlicitide leads the oral PCSK9 race, but AstraZeneca’s AZD0780 is competitive. The table below compares their trial data:

Dimension / Trial Name

Merck MK-0616 (CORALreef Lipids)

AstraZeneca AZD0780 (PURSUIT)

Participants Enrolled

Adults with hypercholesterolemia and ASCVD history/risk (Phase 3) [1]

428 patients with hypercholesterolemia on moderate to high intensity statins (Phase 2b) [6]

Treatment Modality / Dosing

Oral once daily; dose not specified in Phase 3; Phase 2b: 6 mg, 12 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg vs placebo for 8 weeks [12]

Oral once daily; doses: 1 mg, 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg vs placebo for 12 weeks [6]

Primary Endpoint

Percent change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 24; safety (AEs, discontinuations) [1]

Percent change in LDL-C from baseline to Week 12; safety (AEs, labs, ECG, vitals) [6]

Primary Results (LDL-C reduction)

Significant and clinically meaningful reduction at Week 24 (specific % pending) across CORALreef Lipids, HeFH, and AddOn; Phase 2b: –41.2% (6 mg), –55.7% (12 mg), –59.1% (18 mg), –60.9% (30 mg) at Week 8 (p < 0.001) [1, 12]

Placebo-corrected LS mean reduction: –35.3% (1 mg), –37.9% (3 mg), –45.2% (10 mg), –50.7% (30 mg) at Week 12 [6]

Key Secondary Endpoints

Non-HDL-C, ApoB, Lp(a) reductions at Week 24 (Lipids); Phase 2b: Non-HDL-C: –35.9% to –55.8%; ApoB: –32.8% to –51.8%; LDL-C goal achievement: 80.5–90.8% vs 9.3% placebo [1, 12]

Non-HDL-C: ~–45% at 30 mg; ApoB: similar pattern; ACC/AHA LDL-C goal achievement increased dose-proportionally [6]

Safety (Adverse Events / Tolerability)

AEs comparable to placebo; low discontinuations; well-tolerated (Phase 3 Lipids, HeFH, AddOn); Phase 2b: AEs 39.5–43.4% vs placebo 44.0% [1, 12]

AEs: 38.2% vs placebo 32.6%; similar across doses; favorable safety [6]

Key takeaway: Enlicitide’s macrocyclic peptide design delivers robust LDL-C lowering, while AZD0780’s small-molecule profile offers potential manufacturing and cost advantages [6, 12].


Global Oral PCSK9 Pipeline

Drug Candidate

Developer / Company

Development Phase / Status

Drug Type

Indications

Enlicitide (MK-0616)

Merck (MSD)

Phase 3 Completed (CORALreef Lipids/HeFH/AddOn; met all endpoints)

Oral macrocyclic peptide (PCSK9 inhibitor)

Hypercholesterolemia; high cardiovascular risk [1]

AZD0780

AstraZeneca

Phase 2b (PURSUIT) completed; robust LDL-C reduction

Oral small molecule (PCSK9 inhibitor)

Dyslipidemia, including patients not achieving LDL-C targets on statins [2]


Why This Matters

With 70% of ASCVD patients missing LDL-C goals, oral PCSK9 inhibitors could improve adherence, especially in China, where high costs (¥19,976–¥49,088 annually) limit access [7]. Enlicitide’s Phase 3 successes position it for potential market entry, while AZD0780 remains competitive [1, 6]. LIB Therapeutics’ lerodalcibep and Novartis’ inclisiran add to a crowded pipeline, pressuring payers for competitive pricing [5, 10]..


Looking Ahead

Enlicitide’s triumphs in CORALreef Lipids, HeFH, and AddOn trials signal a potential first-mover advantage, but pricing and outcomes data from CORALreef Outcomes will be critical [1]. In China, oral PCSK9 inhibitors could capitalize on market shifts, provided they secure NRDL listing [11]. If Merck replicates its US momentum in China, where adherence and affordability dominate, the first oral PCSK9 could reset the standard of care within five years.


References

  1. Merck & Co., Inc. Merck’s Investigational Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor Enlicitide Decanoate Met All Primary and Key Secondary Endpoints in Adults with Hypercholesterolemia in Pivotal CORALreef Lipids Study. https://www.merck.com/news (accessed September 3, 2025).
  2. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (accessed September 3, 2025).
  3. Sabatine, M. S.; Giugliano, R. P.; Keech, A. C.; et al. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1713–1722.
  4. Schwartz, G. G.; Steg, P. G.; Szarek, M.; et al. Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2097–2107.
  5. Ray, K. K.; Wright, R. S.; Kallend, D.; et al. Two Phase 3 Trials of Inclisiran in Patients with Elevated LDL Cholesterol. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1507–1519.
  6. Rider, D.; Bhatt, D. L.; Nicholls, S.; et al. Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor, AZD0780, Reduces LDL-C in Patients with Dyslipidemia: The PURSUIT Trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2025, 85, A123 (abstract).
  7. Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, S. PCSK9 Inhibitors in China: Current Status and Future Prospects. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2024, 38, 1001–1010.
  8. Mordor Intelligence. PCSK9 Inhibitors Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts (2024–2030). https://www.mordorintelligence.com (accessed September 3, 2025).
  9. DataM Intelligence. Global PCSK9 Inhibitors Market - 2024–2030. https://www.datamintelligence.com (accessed September 3, 2025).
  10. LIB Therapeutics. LIB Therapeutics Announces FDA Acceptance of Biologics License Application for Lerodalcibep. https://www.libtherapeutics.com (accessed September 3, 2025).
  11. Reuters. Sanofi Halts Praluent Supply in China Amid Supply Constraints, Competition. https://www.reuters.com (accessed August 12, 2025).
  12. Ballantyne, C. M.; Banka, P.; Mendez, G.; et al. Phase 2b Randomized Trial of the Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor MK-0616. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023, 81, 1553–1564.